Saturday, October 29, 2011

Bot Bomb Buddies

!±8± Bot Bomb Buddies

It was a worst-case scenario for Specialist Five Doug "Dusty" Rhodes one bloody day in Vietnam. Vietcong snipers were targeting Rhodes and two fellow soldiers, one of whom was standing on a land mine while the other was attempting to place a pin in the device to keep it from exploding. Rhodes, who was later awarded a Bronze Star for heroism, ran to an open area and drew fire while the device was disarmed; and all three men escaped.

Fast forward more than three decades. Today's soldiers in places like Afghanistan and Iraq are no less heroic, but the twenty-first-century EOD (Explosive Ordinance Disposal) devices they have on their side do the dual duties of both drawing fire and disarming explosive devices-all without exposing humans to the dangers they so routinely handle.

No doubt about it: "Robots in Iraq save lives," says Sgt. First Class Jeff Sarver, who has trained with and deployed EOD robots in Iraq, Bosnia, Korea and the U.S.

"The most impressive thing I've seen a robot do was to unzip a suicide vest off a suicide bomber and then take the vest off," recounts Sarver, stationed at Fort McCoy (Wisconsin) and recently returned from service abroad. He describes the kind of multitasking "buddy" that will take the bullet for you, every time--- and diffuse a bomb with one (mechanical) arm tied behind its back, so to speak.

WHAT THEY CAN DO

Robot names are exotic: PackBot, ANDROS, Vanguard, ODIS, SWORDS, TALON. But they're all business. This robotic corps can wade through a foot of sewer water, climb stairs and over rubble, find and defuse old ordnance, identify a "false exhaust" in the undercarriage of a terrorist's car. They can ferret out and neutralize biohazards, radiation and explosive devices hidden in buildings, holes in the ground, wet concrete, even in a pile of corpses.

Here's a rundown of the capabilities of some of the robotic EOD devices currently in use by U.S. armed forces in military hotspots overseas. (Of course, some capabilities overlap, but this listing will demonstrate the incredible versatility of our robotic EOD corps as a whole.)

PackBot, manufactured by iRobot, weighs less than 24 kilograms, and once offloaded from its backpack can be deployed in less than two minutes. It can worm its way into sewers and other dangerous and constricted spaces covered with anything from slick tile to gooey mud. With eight interchangeable payload modules, it senses chemical and biological hazards, detects mines, deploys GPR (ground penetrating radar) and reaches as far as two meters in any direction while providing eyes and ears for its remote operators.

The ANDROS line of robots manufactured by REMOTEC (a subsidiary of Northrop Grumman) is as versatile as a circus family. The Mark V-A1, a heavy-duty vehicle with a unique articulated track, can climb 45 degree stairs and plow over obstacles as high as 24 inches. It has a manipulator arm, gripper, TV cameras and audio, and lights. Its littler brothers, the F6A and the Mini-ANDROS II, are scaled-down models that can get through tighter spaces like airplane aisles and allow quick tool change-outs while still tackling tough terrains. The largest, strongest, wheeled ANDROS is the Wolverine, an environmentally-sealed unit that can operate in high temperatures and humidity to facilitate both remote viewing and delicate manipulation tasks. Finally, over 500 ANDROS Wheelbarrow units deployed in 40 countries have the ability to change center of gravity, neutralize landmines and carry tools like disruptors and equipment to detect explosive and chemical dangers. All the ANDROS vehicles can be controlled from a distance via radio control, fiber optic cable reel, or portable cable reel. Typical price for an ANDROS: ,000-plus each.

Vanguard(TM) robots such as the MKII can slip under the bumper of a suspicious vehicle to inspect for the full range of CBRNE - chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive --threats. It can fit in the trunk of a police car or deploy from a military air drop. Its laptop computer-based command control unit responds to keystroke or joystick and the robot boasts an articulated arm, Proparms disrupters, and night surveillance cameras. It can convert from tracks to wheels in a matter of minutes.

ODIS (Omni-Directional Inspection System), developed by the U.S. Tank-Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC), is a robot system for detecting explosive devices. Described as "a hovercraft on wheels," it can move forward, backwards, right or left and rotate its camera and lights separately or in combination. Even operators with minimal training can, with ODIS's help, identify out-of-place wires or false exhaust pipes underneath a suspicious vehicle. To protect against suicide bombers, a camera mast system allows inspection from a distance and communicates with a "palm-computer based translator system" to let ODIS interact with personnel to verify identifications and relay instructions to vehicle drivers.

TALON (TM) robots (developed by Foster-Miller) offer cutting-edge sensing ability for chemical, gas, radiation, and heat with readings that can be accessed simultaneously, remotely and in real time by means of a single integrated hand-held display (think multiple windows.) The transmitting unit sniffs out everything from gamma radiation to pepper spray and can measure 50 kinds of gas. The robot itself is man-portable and its unmatched speed can pace a running soldier. It can plow through snow and surf and isn't daunted by concertina wire or rock piles. TALON robots have completed more than 20,000 EOD missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

SMWS (Small Mobile Weapons System) TALON robots carry mounts for everything from shotguns, Barrett 50-caliber rifles and M240 machine guns to grenade launchers and M202 anti-tank rocket systems. In fact, "Time" magazine recognized TALON's weaponized robot, SWORDS (Special Weapons Observation Reconnaissance Detection System) as one of the most amazing inventions of 2004, with the warning, "Insurgents, be afraid." Operators can stand up to 1000 meters away to operate the units, which cost between 0,000 to 0,000 each.

RESILIENCE AND REPAIRS

With that kind of price tag, you can bet repairs and spare parts are a big issue. A typical, repairable robot will complete more than 1000 missions. In the Near East, sand and oil are as much enemies to the machines as the bad guys are to US soldier, meriting the observation that one day's work in Iraq for a robot is equal to a year's worth stateside. Thus, parts salvage and quick repairs urge priority for Iraq's Joint Robotic System Repair Station, which has seen robots return with little left but the tracks.

But they're tough little droids. TALON, for instance, boasts that after the 2001 World Trade Center Attack, its robotics units withstood 45 straight days of being decontaminated twice a day without the electronics failing. One TALON, the manufacturer claims, has been blown up three times but is back in combat with new arms, wiring and cameras.

Another, riding on the roof of a Humvee which was crossing a bridge over a river in Iraq, was blown off into the water. To the delight of its handlers, its heavily-damaged control unit was able to direct the TALON to drive itself up out of the river and back to him. Now, that's maximizing resources.

Does this mean that soldiers will become less important or even obsolete as the robotics technology accelerates? Some think so, including Project Alpha, a U.S. Joint Forces Command analysis group, which predicts that by 2025, autonomous battlefield robots will be the rule, not the exception. But contrast that thinking to a recent incident reported in Stars and Stripes in which a group of engineers and armor soldiers of 1st Battalion, 13th Armor Regiment were patrolling near Camp Taji, Iraq.

They became suspicious of a hollowed-out log that turned out to contain artillery wires. As a wheeled robot went down to blow up the log while the soldiers stayed at a safe distance, an insurgent remotely detonated a second bomb nearby, and a third bomb was discovered. The pattern of the second and third bombs was designed to catch the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Soldiers as they investigated the first. The bad guy may have been smarter than the robot, but turned out to be not as smart as the soldiers who learned from the experience.

The lesson was unmistakable: Technology is great. But not just the technology has to keep up with the enemy, so do the humans. They're not only the ones who invent, service, and implement the machines: When bombs are the issue, humans have to be right every time, because soldiers are irreplaceable to the ones who love them.

WHAT'S ON THE ROBOT HORIZON?

Many new robotic devices are being developed for battlefield use. For instance, although the military currently uses unmanned surveillance airplanes operated by humans by remote control, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) is developing something more sophisticated. Its -billion, five-year program aims to develop networked autonomous aircraft (J-UCAS) that can fly in formations and identify targets on which to drop bombs. Such devices will be impervious to human error factors caused by such things as fatigue and G-force while flying coordinated missions at up to 700 kilometers per hour.

Honeywell recently tested the MAV, or Micro Air Vehicle, a tiny (14-pound) DARPA project that operates via a ducted fan which has the engine and propeller inside a composite tube that serves as the flight surface. With a two-cylinder gasoline engine, it can "hover and stare" in ways that fixed-wing devices cannot, allowing it to deploy cameras and chemical sensors, flying up to 10,500 feet in altitude.

Army-funded researchers are developing an unmanned ambulance. The 3500-pound REV, or Robotic Extraction Vehicle, can drag wounded soldiers to safety and shelter them on two stretchers with life-support systems under its armored exterior as they prepare for evacuation. And Sandia National Laboratories has successfully tested an EDS (Explosive Destruction System) that internalizes explosions and contains the blast, vapor, and fragments; as well as treats and destroys biohazards such as anthrax.

For Sgt. First Class Sarver, improvements for EOD can't come too soon. "People have walked on the moon and we're still working with robots that have so much potential," he says. His solution: let the present EOD robot-producing companies put their heads together to make a super-robot that has the speed of the TALON, the weight and frame of the ANDROS, the optics and configurations of the PackBot.

Then, says, Sarver, "you'd have a really nice robot."


Bot Bomb Buddies

Olympus Om4 Review

Monday, October 24, 2011

Healthcare And Facility Infrastructure

!±8± Healthcare And Facility Infrastructure

New diagnostic and treatment equipment occupies dedicated spaces. At the same time, there is increased emphasis on ambulatory care for many procedures and illnesses, with more selective inpatient admissions and decreased length of stays. There also is a trend toward networking remote primary care and diagnostic centers to other types of care facilities.

With these changes comes the need to provide more sophisticated HVAC, power, telecommunications/data and life safety systems. Owners, architects and engineers alike face the challenge of allocating space and developing a facility infrastructure that not only accommodates these systems but also allows optimal integration and flexibility today and in the future.

To meet the demands placed on system infrastructure and to provide future flexibility, space must be allocated for much larger mechanical, electrical and telecommunications distribution hubs and risers. One of the biggest problems in existing facilities, which may be 30, 40 or 50 years old, is finding and reprogramming enough space to revamp the entire core infrastructure and controls. In new facilities, owners may be understandably reluctant to add to the amount of space required for the engineering systems.

Indeed, the proportion of the cost of the building systems to the total cost of a new facility is now approaching 50 percent. Whether planning an upgrade or new construction, finding cost-effective solutions requires cooperation among owners, architects and engineers.

Optimizing the HVAC System

Energy efficiency, indoor air quality, comfort and flexibility for future changes are the key criteria to keep in mind when engineering the HVAC system, which must provide the optimal environment for a range of treatment and support spaces.

HVAC systems today comprise more individual units dedicated to meeting the different temperature and air-quality needs of spaces such as telecommunications/data equipment rooms, diagnostic equipment rooms, operating rooms, emergency rooms and in-patient rooms. Zoning also allows the mechanical engineer to employ specific tools, such as high-efficiency air filters, where they are needed.

To assure indoor air quality, the HVAC system must be able to provide proper filtration and ventilation, and minimize cross-contamination of building spaces. Airflow must be directed from clean areas to less clean spaces and then exhausted outside. Controls must use a reliable monitoring and alarm system to ensure maintenance of proper indoor air quality and pressurization standards.

"All-air" HVAC systems, which allow use of primarily outside air to, whenever possible, heat and cool a facility, enhance indoor air quality and the energy efficiency of the HVAC system. Efficient motors, variable speed drives and economizer cycles all can be used to minimize energy consumption.

In any case, HVAC systems are heavy energy consumers. But deregulation has provided the opportunity to use systems that can use multiple energy sources to run boilers and produce chilled water. At any given time, the facility can choose which energy source to use (electricity, natural gas or steam) depending on demand, cost and availability.

The nature of today's hospital demands selection of state-of-the-art direct-digital-controlled HVAC systems, which are accurate and flexible, allowing control from central and remote locations.

Power: Quantity and Quality

Flexibility of power system infrastructure and power quality are key criteria for the electrical power system design. Spare capacity has to be built into every major normal and emergency power riser. In most cases, minimum code-suggested values for feeder and equipment sizing may not be adequate for modern hospital design because of universal usage of computer equipment for a wide variety of functions.

The nature and sheer volume of hospital systems and equipment also create challenges. For example, more and more equipment today is electronic, which contributes distortion to the electrical system. Current causes this distortion and voltage harmonics that affect both normal and emergency power supply and distribution systems, and sensitive medical electronic equipment fed from it.

To minimize harmonic effects on the power system, 200 percent neutral should be the standard on all three-phase, four-wire systems and equipment. Rectifiers and trap filters are strongly recommended on all variable frequency drives. Emergency generator specifications have to include provisions for 100 percent non-linear loads. Usually, generators will have to be one size larger than the engine size to compensate for non-linear loads.

The high volume of electrical equipment also creates electromagnetic interference. This is not the place to try to economize on construction costs. Electrical engineers often recommend rigid steel conduits for major feeders - especially those passing through critical areas - rather than the thinner, less expensive electrometallic tubing, which does not block magnetic interference.

The ratio of emergency to normal power is increasing. The trend is to place more systems on the emergency generator than dictated by minimum code requirements. For example, cooling is not required to be on generators, but more hospitals are electing to do so. Indeed, owners of facilities designed to meet code and budget requirements just a few years ago now may want to add systems to the emergency generator, only to find that their generators do not have adequate capacity.

Internet, Telemedicine Make the Call

The design of the telecommunications infrastructure in hospitals today is driven by the expanding need for high-speed, high-quality computing and networking both within the hospital facility and between the hospital and the outside world.

Hospitals already have in place or are adding new local area networks (LANs), often Ethernet systems, to network all types of data, from patient records to radiology data, throughout the facility. Now networks are expanding, with installation of data ports at each bed, allowing access to view and update patient records as well as diagnostic images. (The future is in wireless, portable access via hand-held computers, already being seen in some applications.)

Expanding the network to each bed necessitates upgrading the infrastructure to comply with the latest standards. This, in turn, requires telecommunications closets to be dispersed throughout the building, with certain distance limitations between the closets and each data outlet and certain closet size requirements based on the size of the area and the number of outlets.

Meeting these standards and future needs requires a lot of space and, when upgrading an existing facility or planning a new facility, owners and planners must be prepared to allocate it. Usually this space is in the core of the building, not in an underutilized corner, to meet distance requirements.

The good news is that current standards in the design of the telecommunications infrastructure should serve health care facilities well for 10 to 15 years.

This means that - even if new cable itself may be required in the next decade - the number and spacing of telecommunications closets should remain consistent - the crucial issue in space planning. Indeed, many believe that the next generation of cable will be "all we will ever need" in copper cable. Additional speed will have to be accommodated using fiber-optic cable.

The logical extension of the LAN is a wide-area network (WAN) that enables telemedicine: remote access to patient records, diagnostic images and other data by computer, with the capability of simultaneous videoconferencing. A lot of institutions are talking about telemedicine, and some are forming pilot projects. Some are making the connections between the hospital and physicians' offices and outpatient clinics over the Internet. Others are using dedicated T1 or ISDN phone lines, which offer higher-bandwidth (i.e., high quality) communication as well as quick speeds.

In fact, much of the capability for the WAN depends on the main telecommunications equipment in the building and the cabling that goes out to the world. Many hospitals have multiple T1 copper phone lines coming in and some fiber-optic cable. The trend is to bring in more fiber, which is what is really needed to drive video imaging. Either way, space is needed in the main telecommunications room for the large amount of equipment to communicate with remote sites.

Life Safety, Security

As it is in emergency power, so it is in life safety: The trend is to exceed code in both existing and new facilities. Many existing hospitals have outdated fire alarm systems and inadequate sprinkler systems by today's standards. Owners are retrofitting with modern, computer-controlled fire alarm systems - centrally monitored and controlled from a fire command station, usually in the main lobby.

The new systems require new water service, fire pump and vertical distribution system and additional sprinklers. This complicates the cost and space issues. A sophisticated mechanical system can also provide smoke control, either automatically or manually from the fire control station. This is a highly reliable early warning system.

Security systems are vendor-driven, changing rapidly, and are generally planned and implemented after a building is completed. Much of a security installation is low voltage. Thus, engineers should assure that enough space and power are allocated in the backbone for security hub equipment. Needs differ, but most security systems today use some combination of card access and biometrics readers, motion detection, closed-circuit television and metal detectors, as well as personnel.

Higher Demands

It's also worth mentioning that stand-alone ambulatory care facilities may place even higher demands on infrastructure because there is more sophisticated equipment packed into them than in some hospitals, which contain patient rooms and more support spaces.

Now, what about controls? Given the size and complexity of the hospital setting, integrated controls would seem to offer distinct benefits. Yet it is not only expensive but often difficult to build a system that integrates control of all mechanical and electrical systems because many control manufacturers' systems are proprietary.

There has been an effort in the market to develop "open protocol systems" - creating an integrated control system - but applications have involved links between components or subsystems rather than completely integrated automation systems. Today, it is more common to selectively marry major control components to the building management system regardless of whether the controls use open protocols. Continued introduction of products that use open protocols promises to expand the use of integrated control systems.

In the final analysis, designing a health care facility infrastructure for the 21st century is all about optimizing system integration and flexibility to ensure that the facility will remain a fully functioning organism in the future. Perhaps nowhere else is the metaphor of infrastructure as "backbone" more apt than in health care.


Healthcare And Facility Infrastructure

Thibaut Wallpaper Free Shipping Waffle And Pancake Mix Cheap Malted Waffle Mix Immediately


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Fran�ais Deutsch Italiano Portugu�s
Espa�ol ??? ??? ?????







Sponsor Links